In all analyses statistical significance was set at p < 0
Into the Fig
Salt sensitive: Participants with SBP being at least 5 mmHg higher after HS intake compared to the values after the LS intake; Salt resistant: Participants whose SBP differed by <5 mmHg between HS and LS intakes; Independent variables: Urinary Na + , Urinary K + and Na + :K + excretion ratio; Dependent variable: SBP; Categorical variable: Participants were categorized into groups on the basis of increments of 1 g/day in urinary Na + and K + excretion to evaluate the linear trends
General linear activities have been used in linear regression study (Pearson’s R relationship) to evaluate the brand new relationship off urinary Na + and you may K + excretion with SBP. To possess Figs. 2 and you will step three, two-method ANOVA which have Tukey’s blog post hoc was did evaluate SBP one of the teams discussed on the basis of urinary Na + and you may K + removal. To help you assess the effectiveness of expanding urinary Na + and you can K + removal prior to SBP, Cohn’s Feeling Size is calculated. When you look at the Figs. 4 and you may 5 generalized Pearson’s Roentgen correlation is did to assess the latest relationship of urinary Na + :K + excretion proportion having SBP. six analysis have been assessed by a about three-ways ANOVA plus the pairwise reviews have been made playing with Tukey’s article hoc sample. 7 relative regularity shipment is reviewed playing with an excellent Gaussian fit study. 05 (GraphPad prism application, adaptation 8). Research is actually displayed given hinge that mean ± SD.
Baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) at screening on regular diet (a) according to changes sodium excretion of <5 g/day, in salt sensitive (n = 154) and salt resistant (n = 180) group, slope of the for salt sensitive group is indicated for the sodium excretion ranges of <2–2.99 g/day, 3–3.99 g/day and 4–4.99 g/day (b) Correlation of baseline SBP (dependent variable) across the entire range of urinary sodium excretion (independent variable), (Pearson's R 2 for salt sensitive = 0.02 and for salt resistant = 0.02), in salt sensitive (n = 186) and salt resistant (n = 222) individuals.
Baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) at screening on regular diet (a) according to changes potassium excretion for salt sensitive (n = 186) and salt resistant (n = 222) group, slope for salt sensitive and salt resistant group is indicated for the potassium excretion range <1–1.99 g/day, values shown as mean ± SD. b Correlation of baseline SBP (dependent variable) across the entire range urinary potassium excretion (independent variable), (Pearson's R 2 for salt sensitive = 0.001 and salt resistant = 0.008), in salt sensitive (n = 186) and salt resistant (n = 222) individuals.
Baseline SBP prior to urinary salt so you can potassium removal proportion (Na + /K + ) (a) correlation away from standard SBP (oriented variable) across the entire variety of urinary Na + /K + removal (separate varying), (Pearson’s Roentgen 2 to possess salt sensitive = 0.0004 and sodium unwilling = 0.0016) (b) baseline SBP based on alterations in salt excretion and potassium removal range for the sodium painful and sensitive (n = 186) and you will sodium unwilling (letter = 222) anyone during the evaluation on their normal diet plan, opinions revealed due to the fact suggest ± SD. Analysis was examined of the about three-means ANOVA with pairwise investigations with Tukey’s blog post hoc take to.
Correlation out of SBP viewpoints over the entire listing of urinary sodium so you’re able to potassium removal (Na + /K + ) ratio from inside the salt sensitive and painful (letter = 71) and you may salt unwilling (n = 119) people with dieting intervention of your own Dietary Ways to Stop Hypertension (DASH) (a) large sodium (HS), (Pearson’s Roentgen 2 having salt delicate = 0.04 and you can salt unwilling = 0.04) (b) low sodium (LS) diet plan, (Pearson’s R dos to possess salt delicate = 0.02 and you may sodium resistant = 0.00002).